On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 05:45:13PM -0600, Jim Fleming wrote:
> http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2003-March/008088.html
> "why is there such a delay in getting ipv6 rolled out when it solves all these problems ?"
I doubt that users will stop using NAT until ISPs stop charging per address for SOHO customers.
and if ipv6 made the addresses much more freely available your isp could afford to dish out all you could ever want on a $20/month connection.
The ip's are not just free to the ISP, there is a cost associated with them each year in addition to the bandwidth you use. Not to mention it makes routing rules more complex the more ips an isp has to deal with in separate groups.
BellSouth charges $10/month for each additional IP address for their ADSL service, that's in addition to their DSL charges.
Cox Cable (Gulf Coast) charges $13.90/month for two additional IP addresses.
Neither service permits static IP addresses unless you want to use their business internet service which is generally about 2x the cost of residential.
So rather than spending the extra money or upgrading to a bussiness service people will use NAT.
Personally I have three IP addresses from Cox Cable, one for my NAT router and two for testing various devices that don't work with NAT.
--Eric _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
