Many of the hardware-based solutions I've seen use G723 and G729... I'm hoping to find a smaller codec than GSM that doesn't require *too much* CPU. (I'd like to use something like speex, but rumor has it that the CPU requirements are way out of my league.)
Jared On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 10:00, John Harragin wrote: > >I think it's only being tested with GSM right now, but I'm not aware of > any reason why you couldn't use another codec. Maybe Mark can enlighten > us with some details?!? (Thanks Mark for implementing this! I know I'll > use it a LOT!) > > This brings up another question. As long as T1s have been around, it seems > obvious that there should be codecs especially for this purpose. Does anyone > know if this is the case? > > John > > > This e-mail was scanned and found clean by Monroe-Woodbury CSD Antivirus. > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
