> > was that mysql 3.23.x or 4.0.x ? > michael I did most of my mysql work some time ago with 3.x. I have, however, installed mysql 4.0.12 since I'm working on a CASE tool which needs to support both mysql and postgresql. I'll be the first to admit that mysql has probably improved (a lot?) since then. I was simply relating my experience with both mysql and postgresql.
> > > *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** > > On 28.05.2003 at 16:18 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >> My example of heavy load where mysql could not even begin to handle the > >> situation was a project with real time stock market data streamed in as > >> bids and offers and trades happened, statistics computed from that in > >real > >> time, database kept in sync live, and charts and graphs plotted in real > >> time for users on the site. Now that situation had more than its share > >of > >> inserts and updates, and a massive wad of historical data being kept > >just > >> to add to the fun. > > > >...and I can even top that. I had an Intrusion Detection System proof > >of concept which logged to a Postgresql database. This database > >received 10-15 Million inserts a day and I was required to keep 90 day's > >worth of data. Most of the elects were done in batch during "slow" times > >at > >night. Some of the queries were expected to run in "near-real time." > >And might I also add that postgres did just fine... > > > >> Might I add for record that postgres did just fine. > > > >Mike Diehl. > >_______________________________________________ > >Asterisk-Users mailing list > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
