> I already use macros to simplify, but at some point you are reduced > to using priorities. > > It seems inelegant to rely on my editor or a post-processor to handle > things that are easily handled just by trivially changing the way > that the parser works.
Well that is true. However it may not be trivia. You could introduce a bunch of side issues with things like the way that busys work. On the other hand, I have had the trouble you describe and a fall through conf might make for eazier management of big confs with gotos. That said, my reply had taken on a tangental life of its own as I was mostly objecting to the idea of re-numbering the way the as/400 does - which I had mentioned - and really only as a point of interest. Sheesh, I type so slow I can't remember what was at the beginning of this sentence. John _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users