And what does your post have to do with SIP?
Where did u get H323 from?
Dave was referring to the way in which Sebastian included a "References:" header in his e-mail, generated by clicking "reply to" and changing the subject, rather than creating a fresh and shiny new mail. This breaks the threading on any mail client that has a clue (Mozilla, Evolution, numerous others) and is therefore to be avoided. If you don't use a thread-view capable mail client on high volume mailing lists, you don't know what you're missing.
In your defence, I'd say to Dave that one exclamation mark is generally sufficient. Additionally, making aggressive remarks regarding netiquette isn't terribly useful. Pointers saying what exactly someone has done wrong and suggesting a solution are much more useful. Everybody play nice, m'kay?
Learn to read!
J (aka mailing list etiquette nazi)
For someone who claims to be a mailing list etiquette nazi, you're not doing terribly well. :)
I believe, for example, that most people prefer you not to include the whole of the previous post within your own, but to quote in context. I'd also prefer not to have the "CommuniGate(tm) Pro" spam taglines. But enough of these petty squablings...
-- Alastair Maw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MX Telecom - Systems Analyst http://www.mxtelecom.com
_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
