Actually, the DTMF double digits might have been an Asterisk/rfc2833 bug (which was just fixed) rather than a 7960 bug. We have been using 7960's for a couple of years, very solid, very few problems.
We are holding at ver 4 , because I don't want to get stuck on 5 (signed code) and can't back out if I need to. Lee ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nathan Littlepage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 8:58 AM Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco 7940 7960 > Thanks for the insight. I noticed the DTMF issues in the archive, but > since it was so old I assumed it would be fixed. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan > > Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 1:57 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco 7940 7960 > > > > > > Just some problems in the past with doubled digits in DTMF. > > Tested only with firmware P0S3-04-4-00 in SIP mode. > > > > Dan > > P.S. When connected over a less reliable connection, the > > phone link to the > > Asterisk server is lost, even in the same conditions an IAX > > soft phone works > > without any problems. I think that this is more SIP related > > (than phone). > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Nathan Littlepage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 12:31 AM > > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco 7940 7960 > > > > > > > Has anyone had any major issues with the Cisco 7940 and or > > 7960 phones? > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
