On Monday 11 Jul 2005 05:02, Michael Stearne wrote: > On 7/10/05, Jim Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks William and John, I'll look again for that download. Comments > > below... > > > > --On Sunday, July 10, 2005 1:50 PM +0200 Wilson Pickett > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > FWIW? I bought that voice and I find it amusing, but not ready for > > > prime time. I had it read articles from a publication and it was > > > ludicrous. I can understand the people talking about ATT, I think I > > > heard a demo that was very convincing. > > > > What is ATT? Is it another text to speech engine? I installed Festival > > a > > AT&T Natural voices seem to be pretty good. You can hear samples here: > http://www.wizzardsoftware.com/att_desktop.php . The Rich voice I > think sounds the best. They are a little better than the Cepstral > voices. But the Cepstral voices are vey good also.
Compared to Rhetorical (http://www.rhetorical.com/cgi-bin/demo.cgi), the ATT system sounds awful. B _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
