Whilst I understand your need to have agents decide when they are ready to continue I think that the current situation is a better one (although not necessarily for your environment).

Surely if and agent can decide when he is available less calls get answered? Isn't the whole point of wrap up time to allow them time to finish typing, take a breath, sip some tea and then get back into the fray again?

Couldn't the agents in your situation log out if they need more time than you have allowed? What do they do should they need to take a leak?

Callum McGillivray wrote:
Hi all,

I was wondering if there was a way to deal with "wrap up" time for agents slightly better than we do it at the moment.

At the moment, we set a wrap up time of 20 seconds for each of our call queues. The problem with this is that sometimes it's either too long or two short.

I would essentially like to have all agents put into wrap up straight after a call, and have to dial a couple of digits to tell Asterisk they are ready to receive a call again.

That way, if the agent is ready, he could dial the digits straight away, or in 3-4 minutes when he has finished what he is doing.

I was also wondering if there might be a way to monitor how much wrap up time each agent had used for a day (to make sure that it was not abused).

Anyone have any hints / clues ?

Thanks,

Callum
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


--

Mark, G7LTT/KC2ENI
Randolph, NJ
http://www.g7ltt.com
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to