Noah Miller wrote:
Hi Andres -
The two that we have are just used as lobby phones. They're good
little phones, but if you have the money, I'd definitely recommend
the IP501 instead. The screen is MUCH better, and having full
speakerphone is great! Plus the 500/501 just feels a little more solid.
Yeah, I think it was a wrong move going for the 301 instead,
Hmm. I'm not sure either. I've never used AMP before (except for a
quick glance at [EMAIL PROTECTED]). If you can change the sip settings,
I don't think it should matter.
I am not using [EMAIL PROTECTED], it didn't work well for me, I just using AMP over
asterisk, and yes, sip are 100% tweakable,
how do you configure your system, all by hand?
Well, the two weird things I see here are the type setting and the
host. Type is set to peer, but there doesn't seem to be a
corresponding user definition (AFAIK, all peers have to have users).
You might try changing it to "type=friend" instead (like 201).
I did it, it was set to peer just because I red somewhere that Polys
didn't like friend type,
For the host setting, this is the address of the sip device, and not
the asterisk server. If you have the Polycom set to a static address
of 192.168.1.18, all is well. If your Polycom is set to DHCP (this
is the default), you should use "host=dynamic"
it's fixed to 18
A couple of things that I know you don't need:
nat=never
qualify=no
I took them off too, I got them from the only "how to" I found about amp
and the polycom,
- Noah
Thanks ,
I hope I can help you same day,
Andres
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
