--- "Kevin P. Fleming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It _IS_ true, the code that does that work was even
> recently improved.

Keven,
True, my mistake. I had 2 asterisk boxes, one running
ver 1.0.7 and the other running 1.2.0-beta1.
The log I posted before was from the 1.0.7, when I
looked at the log of the other box (1.2.0-beta1), it
was perfectly fine.

Thank you for pointing this out.



        
                
__________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 
http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to