You're probably not going to be violating any patent protections by using OGG instead of MP3. As far as compression goes, I've found the difference between the two of them to be negligible. I've always used OGG when possible to stay "IP safe".
On 11/7/05, Waldo Rubinstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm trying to archive out call recordings and would appreciate some > feedback as to which audio compression is more recommended MP3 or > OGG. In the past, I've use lame to convert to MP3, but I noticed the > audio volume drops significantly. Is it just a setting on the command > line of lame or is OGG better? Which achieves higher compression > rates while maintaining call quality? > > Thanks, > Waldo > > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
