Furthermore, I noticed that at one point, I have 11 active channels
in * in box B and I have 79 mpg123 processes running. It looks like
after a call is off hold or hung up, the mpg123 process is not
terminated. Does this make sense?
- Waldo
On Nov 9, 2005, at 1:10 PM, Waldo Rubinstein wrote:
Following up on my post from yesterday, I upgraded two machines to
1.2rc1.
One of the uses mpg123 and the other one does not. The one that
does not use mpg123 simply does not offer ANY MOH.
Calls come in through the box which does not use mpg123 (box A) and
are forwarded to the other box (the one using mpg123) (box B) using
IAX trunks and are then answered by SIP clients connected to this
second box.
After 4 hours of testing, box A's memory usage has only increased
by 5 MB, while for box B, memory usage has increased by 1.2GB of RAM.
Could there be a memory leak by using mpg123? Could there be
something else going on? Any advice?
Thanks,
Waldo
On Nov 8, 2005, at 4:18 PM, Waldo Rubinstein wrote:
I don't know if there could be a memory leak or something in
1.2b2, but I noticed that my box running 1.2b2 eats through memory
like crazy.
I'm running 1.0.9 on a 1.5GB RAM machine. After 8 hours from a
clean reboot, the machine is using about 900MB of RAM.
On a 1.2b2 with 2GB RAM, after the same period of time from a
clean reboot, the machine is using 2GB of RAM.
Both these figures are reported from running the 'top' command.
Also, the two machines serve the same purpose. They handle call
queues (about 1500 calls after 8 hours each call lasting about 8
minutes average) with MOH playing mp3 files with mpg123 from the
asterisk installation.
Is this normal?
Thanks,
Waldo
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
