Eric "ManxPower" Wieling wrote:
Neil Cherry wrote:
Funny thing is I can get Asterisk to use the 's' extension as a
catch all (I use the include => xcontext command). But I needed
to describe it properly for chapter in a book I'm writing. Man
I hope I get this stuff right!
BTW, I'm using SIP extensions to do all my testing. Works great
(when I remember to include the correct contexts ;-)
exten => s is NOT a "catchall" it's more of a "catch nothing" i.e. it
only catches calls that have no destination info. A "catchall" would be
exten => _. but that would catch extensions that are not numbers (like
o, i, t, T, h, etc). A catch all number extensions would be something
like exten => _X.
Thanks, you just pointed out 2 huge mistakes on my part. The first
is what I thought 's' was for and the second is that my above
statement is untrue. I used the '_.' as the catch all. I'll correct
that. Again thanks!
--
Linux Home Automation Neil Cherry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.comcast.net/~ncherry/ (Text only)
http://hcs.sourceforge.net/ (HCS II)
http://linuxha.blogspot.com/ My HA Blog
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
