---- Original Message ----- From: "Brian Capouch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 10:18 AM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Mission-Critical Deployments
> C F wrote: > > > This is exactly what I disagree with. The BT101's are not worth > > *anything* even if you pay me to take them I will *never* install them > > for a client. They need babysitting, rebooting, terrible sound > > quality, and are very not userfriendly. Going the analog way (vs > > BT101) is not close pricewise it is a *lot* cheaper, since it works. > > The BT101's don't, it creates tooooooooooooo much trouble for any > > office to deal with. > > We've got a couple dozen BT-101s deployed in an office environment. No > babysitting, no complaints from users, no rebooting. Their sound > quality isn't the same as a Cisco 7920, but neither is their price. . . > > In other words, folks, YMMV. > > I say it's worth a person's while to invest a bit in a prototype lab, > and that way you can form your own opinions and not have to rely on the > often-conflicting opinions of others. . > Sounds like why I wrote - 'I would have to test them side by side' PaulH _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
