On 11/23/05, Jean-Denis Girard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > BJ Weschke wrote: > > Yes. The biggest challenge is putting together a mux device that > > mixes the text frames out to all of the user/channel threads in the > > conference. > > I've updated my initial patch two days ago. Now a new thread is created > for each new message sent to the conference: this thread sends the > message to all members of the conference, and then exits. So there is no > more risk of blocking the sending channel. There is no mixing of text > messages, but do we really need that ? > > As a side note I didn't get email from bug tracker about my update > (http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=5808). > Your latest patch is an improvement from your original one, but it still doesn't really follow the design model and creates a situation where your thread and the user's conf_run thread could be trying to get at the same channel at the same time. While you can deal with this kind of situation with channel locking, I think it'd still be "cleaner" to integrate the distribution of the messages into the conf_run thread that exists already for each leg in the conference.
Additionally, mantis won't send you emails about updates you personally make to issues. -- Bird's The Word Technologies, Inc. http://www.btwtech.com/ _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users