Ok. I will give one more shot on that. Last time I had one-way-audio issue
with that. Thanks.
Isamar
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, Boris Bakchiev wrote:
No, max we used is 30 channels.
But according to voip-info its faster protocol because it offloads media
processing to asterisk (which is a better choice I think) and only looks
after H323 call setup.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 6 December 2005 11:28
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] h323 vs oh323
Ok.. how many channels are you using? More than 100?
Maybe it can be good only for 10 or 20 simultaneous connections...
Isamar
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, Boris Bakchiev wrote:
I like the chan_ooh323.
I like the idea of selfcontained H323 channel that doesn't rely
external
libraries, often with specific versions that conflict with something
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
