On Monday 20 March 2006 09:39, Kristian Larsson wrote: > I just love this attitude.
A modicum of thought for others may save you from yourself. This has been discussed many, many times. The problem is a complex one, and one that has been thought through many times by people much smarter than you and I. The general consensus has been that having 50 lists is *no* better than having the three (more if you count the svn commits, documentation, etc.) we have now. Why can you not understand this, or at least read over the archives which point this out and contain the entire discussion regarding the problem? Why do you instead post this snarky, sarcastic comment? Do we need to cater to you and rehash all the discussion just for your benefit? > Could someone managing these lists outline the > requirements to change the lists? Read the archives. Do your own homework. > Do we need a vote or is it something which can be > simply adopted once the right people recognize the > problem (and if so, who is the right people)? Again, read the archives. The answers and reasons behind this are all there. -A. _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users