On Mar 23, 2006, at 6:58 PM, BJ Weschke wrote:
We run into situations like this often as well, and it's truly
unfortunate, because it gives our industry and the technology driving
it a bad name, and like you, some customers want to go back to TDM and
have nothing to do with VoIP at all because they find "safety" again
in a PRI/T1/POTS relationship where there's one carrier whom you have
an SLA with and you can beat them up when something's not working.
I look forward to the day when "full service solutions providers"
consider the network in addition to just the application and don't
consider a public internet IP connection, sans any QoS infrastructure,
to your run of the mill volume ITSP "carrier grade".
It sounds to me like you are suggesting that a QoS infrastructure can
be utilized over the internet at large? Is this only true for big guys
that have an SLA in place?
I would love to discover some QoS mechanism that is respected in
general, but that doesn't seem to be the case? Even Speakeasy, when I
called them to see if there was an existing QoS modality in place on
there network, refused to provide any info.
This seems like the single biggest problem for a broader adoption of
Voip ?
Marty
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
