I think it is correct. Isn't that why they call it a Smart Jack? I've only ever seen a regular cat5 cable used from the Smart Jack to the device (router/PBX/CSU/DSU/whatever).
I believe the point of the smart jack is, amongst other things, to allow for the use of readily available cables. I agree however that "back-to back" (PBX-PBX etc) you would need a cross-over cable. Mark On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 18:14 -0400, Steven Totaro wrote: > The "telco guys" probably did something non-industry standard and reversed > send and receive in the jack that they plugged the CAT5 into. Sure it works, > sure it is easier, sure it is not the correct way of doing things. > > Thanks, > Steve > > ________________________________ > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Lacy Moore - Aspendora > Sent: Sat 4/22/2006 2:55 PM > To: Paul Mahler; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: Re: Pinouts for T1/E1 crossover cable WAS "RE: > [Asterisk-Users]whatcable to connect a legacy PBX to a TE410P ?" > > > at&t (formerly SBC, formerly Southwestern Bell, formerly AT&T) just came out > and installed my PRI. FYI, they used Cat 5e cable. No special T1 cabling > that costs a fortune to buy somewhere, just plain old Cat 5e cable. Guess > what guys? If they are using this as customers' sites, they are probably > using it elsewhere. It's only as good as the weakest link, so you can go out > and spend lots of money on "T1 cable", or just use Cat 5e like the telco guys > do. > > > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
