Steve Totaro wrote:
I have searched google and came up with too many options and packages that may or may not work for my needs, most articles seem to be for setting up routers. Maybe someone on the list can give me some better insight.

I have monitoring turned on my "shift eight (tm)" (Asterisk ;-)) box for all calls. We have over one hundred agents and tons of recordings in wav format. I also have a cron job that runs a script to mux the in and out files and ftp them to a NAS device and it runs every five minutes. The NAS device and the * box are both directly connected to a Cisco Gigabit switch. I have had complaints of calls fading in and out and also cutting off. After reviewing the recordings, some of these complaints seem valid and I suspect the sheer bandwidth of the FTP traffic is causing the issues. I also run nagios checks on the box and get ping warnings on a regular basis. My question is, how can I throttle the FTP (Standard with dist) transfers using out of the box CentOS4.3 (or any easy to use, low learning curve package)? I thought about FTPing the files at less frequent intervals but that just makes the issue less frequent but last longer. I would like to accomplish throttling FTP on the Linux box with a solution that is not too elegant since this is a production machine in a busy call center. If I cannot do it on the * box I guess my next step is to see if the Cisco Gigabit switch has any QoS functionality.
Thanks,
Steve

Steve,

        Now for the fancy solutions:

1) Try enabling NAPI interrupt handling for your ethernet card. Some people report that it reduces interrupt load while increasing transfer speed by %85 - %100 (on the same processor, with the Intel e1000 driver and a good Intel NIC). I haven't tried it yet, but that is what I have read...

2)  AstShape:

http://www.krisk.org/astlinux/misc/astshape

3)  AstShape and Cisco:

http://www.krisk.org/astlinux/misc/astshape

Configure the Catalyst to map packets with IP TOS 0x10 and 0x18 into the second highest priority (the highest priority is reserved for "network control messages"). Either whatever the Cisco has or 802.1p 5 (the highest priority for "end user" traffic).

At gigabit speeds QoS configured like this will probably just waste CPU time (on both the machine and the switch) while not being very effective. Try my simple suggestions from my previous post first! :)

--
Kristian Kielhofner
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to