Bob Chiodini wrote: > Thomas Kenyon wrote: >> Mostly it uses the wrong impedance, and I know I can probably get an >> impedance matching transformer, but I'm not allowed to spend any money >> that I don't need to. >> (Otherwise I'd have replaced the amp in the first place with one that >> didn't fall from the arc). >> >> > Won't you still need to maintain the loop current to make the PAP2 look > like the port is off-hook? (FXS BTW) > Err, yeah, the PAP2 only has FXS ports. > I would think the impedance matching xformer falls int the "need to" > category. > It would do, if they were different impedances. This isn't a normal audio amp, it expects to be plugged into an extension port of an analogue phone system (which sees it as permanently off-hook).
I'm not there to test any of this, but I did plug it into an FXS port of the AG-468 that's there to see if it sounded okay, and the whole place rumbled with the configured dialtone :-) So hopefully the same will apply with a PAP2. _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
