Kristian Kielhofner wrote:
Mike Fedyk wrote:
I happen to have asterisk running as a router, so I use it doing QoS
with tc (traffic control) and wondershaper set to prioritize based on
port ranges. I sent a patch to the debian bug tracking system a
while back with a few improvements -- I should check on that. It
basically prioritizes smaller packets before larger packets with ~8
levels of priority and groups of sizes for the packets. Just doing
that automatically handles 80% of the need for prioritization without
specifying port ranges for the sip rtp packets.
Mike
Mike,
Have you tried AstShape? Shapping based on port ranges is totally
hit or miss. TOS is the way to go:
http://www.krisk.org/files/astlinux-i586/usr/sbin/astshape
Comment out the . /etc/rc.conf and you should be okay!
Actually the above is wrong. I don't use port ranges at all, just
packet sizes. It allows me to blast away with p2p, interactive ssh and
scp file copies all while having two g.711 and one g.729 voip
conversation going on a dsn connection with a 384Kbps upload speed.
It is based on the premise that smaller packets should have higher
priority. There will be exceptions of course, and empty classes have
are there for that also. For the common case, no configuration is
necessary.
Give this one a try:
http://mikefedyk.com/wondershaper-pkt-size-classes
Mike
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
