On 06/23/06 01:22 Andy Brezinsky said the following:
< Protocol Discriminator: Q.931 (8)  len=47
< Call Ref: len= 2 (reference 15996/0x3E7C) (Originator)
< Message type: SETUP (5)

 > Protocol Discriminator: Q.931 (8)  len=10
 > Call Ref: len= 2 (reference 48764/0xBE7C) (Terminator)
 > Message type: CALL PROCEEDING (2)

 > Protocol Discriminator: Q.931 (8)  len=14
 > Call Ref: len= 2 (reference 48764/0xBE7C) (Terminator)
 > Message type: CONNECT (7)

i may be way offbase with this, but on our PRI calls, we usually have asterisk sending an ALERTING between the CALL PROCEEDING and CONNECT. this seems borne out by...


< Protocol Discriminator: Q.931 (8)  len=9
< Call Ref: len= 2 (reference 15996/0x3E7C) (Originator)
< Message type: RELEASE (77)

< Protocol Discriminator: Q.931 (8)  len=13
< Call Ref: len= 2 (reference 15996/0x3E7C) (Originator)
< Message type: STATUS (125)
< [08 03 83 e5 07]
< Cause (len= 5) [ Ext: 1 Coding: CCITT (ITU) standard (0) 0: 0 Location: Transit network (3) < Ext: 1 Cause: Message not compatible with call state (101), class = Protocol Error (6) ]

..."Message not compatible with call state" STATUS returned by the other side. you may want to experiment with a Wait(2) before the Answer().

--
Regards,                           /\_/\   "All dogs go to heaven."
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                (0 0)   http://www.openmalaysiablog.com/
+==========================----oOO--(_)--OOo----==========================+
| for a in past present future; do                                        |
|   for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do   |
|   echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b."  |
| done; done                                                              |
+=========================================================================+
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to