While I don't disagree with you, look at what my point was, just accusing them for such without any documentation doesn't make sens.
On 7/11/06, trixter aka Bret McDanel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 20:16 -0400, C F wrote: > I find this hard to believe, half a truth is a whole lie. First you > just say the screwed you out $3k, not saying how, letting everyone > assume thru phone service, then you change the story, you lied before, > how do we know you are saying the truth now? Elaborating on a story isnt changing it, its providing additional details. That is hardly a lie. The fact that he claims he lost $3000 from nufone did not in anyway change, the fact that you assumed something then found out that you were wrong in your assumption does not make him a liar either. But you get an A for effort. > In any case it doesnt make sense anyhow, why would you pay $3k for > just setting up a server, when others here on the list will do it for > much less. Also they never did the work? just took the money? thats an > accusation that doesn't make sense. Just becuase others will do it for less doesnt mean that he didnt opt for them to do the work. I dont see that as not making sense, there are many lawyers out there that charge a premium for their services when you can get one much cheaper. Yet the expensive ones still get clients. The same is true for virtually every industry and even products. People will buy name brand foods instead of the white label generics even though they might be the same. People buy brand name drugs instead of the generics (which are identical in chemical composition) yet the generics are cheaper. It happens every day in virtually every good and service. As for someone taking the money and not doing the work, that happens all too often as well. As such a claim that it doesnt make sense that someone wanted something for nothing isnt so easily dismissed. NuFone placed a ton of international calls on behalf of a customer, then later they tried to not pay for the service that was provided according to their contract. Why? Because the calls were to a destination that had a high billing rate and NuFone didnt charge enough for the call. They signed the contract to pay for those services, they billed the customer for those calls, yet they didnt want to make good on it (jermey was all too eager to talk about this to forbes and other major publications too, so its Jermeys claim that they didnt want to pay for service provided). As such the "something for nothing" issue is something NuFone has an admitted history of. That tends to lend credibility to the claim that they did indeed do this, although it doesnt prove it, and the 'doesnt make sense' argument is no better than 'chewbacca'. Again you get an A for effort. -- Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com Bret McDanel Belfast IE +44 28 9099 6461 DE +49 801 777 555 3402 Utrecht NL +31 306 553058 US WA +1 360 207 0479 US NY +1 516 687 5200 FreeWorldDialup: 635378 http://www.trxtel.com the VoIP provider that pays you! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEtEcx+1olxlzQw5cRAvz3AKCOXgz+Zn+EiAYr3Pn3WW3UMZLM9gCeM2Ni eEkyrr7IV3+ESR0JG0sJsIU= =xgdk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users