On 3 Aug 2006, at 09:14, Jon Schøpzinsky wrote:
Hello
Im trying to decide whether or not I want to use IAX2 trunking on
our WRAP based customer computers.
As it only has a 200mhz processor, I want to make shure that the
trunking part does not affect call quality.
Does anybody know if trunking is more CPU intensive than non trunking?
At a guess I'd say less cpu load from a trunked link.
I'm saying this because you will get fewer packets and hence
fewer interrupts, fewer context switches, so over all a saving
that will outweigh the additional frames asterisk will have to create
and copy data into.
This depends a bit on your ethernet card/driver of course.
If you are only passing a single call over the trunk, then you lose,
but only slightly.
The only other counter factor is that you have to have a timing source
to use trunking, which will generate some cpu load itself, again this
depends on your hardware.
Tim.
Tim Panton
www.mexuar.com
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
