Dovid Bender wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Davies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
<asterisk-users@lists.digium.com>
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 6:01 AM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] SNOM 360
On 7/31/06, Koopmann, Jan-Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday, July 28, 2006 3:08 PM Dovid Bender wrote:
> I am trying to have thier PC run thru the port on the phone and the
> phone give prioroty to itself and the rest to the PC. When my client
> does a big download the phone call gets real bad. The docs from SNOM
> on TOS (or DIFFSERV) is poor and I dont understand it well enough.
> Anyone have configs or docs on how they did this ?
I would be surprised to learn that the Snom is actively doing traffic
management itself.
Traffic managment must be done at the bottleneck to be halfway
successful. Let's
assume you are doing a download and you snom would do traffic
management giving
itself priority. What if your co-worker is doing a huge download? How
should your
snom know and throttle his download? No way.
That is a different problem entirely, and as you say, the snom cannot
do anything about a remote bottleneck (except perhaps theough QoS and
TOS flags in the data it sends).
The snom does seem to manage its two local ports properly though but
this cannot be hard. Worst case is that the snom needs about 128Kb/s -
Not hard on a 100Mb/s full duplex connection :)
Dovid - Have you identified where the bottleneck is in this case? You
do not specify as far as I can see. Is the VoIP call using the
internet, or is it local?
Regards,
Steve
It is using the internet. The problem is when a user starts a big
download. The phone call goes to s***.
Dovid,
I would guess that:
First thing would be quick&dirty ASCII drawing, showing where is the PC,
the SNOM and the "sources/destinations" of the Internet and VOIP traffic.
You mentioned download, assuming this is a DSL connection, this would
be, when it arrive at the IP phone, would be too late to do anything, IF
you are bumping into a bottleneck in the DSL downstream.
What 'direction' of the voice path is suffering, did you capture the
traffic (is it suffering because of jitter, packet loss, ...) ?
Like others mention, QoS (the buzzword :-), is a very wide and generic
term, and you will need to 'isolate' the problem to see if a solution is
feasible.
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users