But some of the other suggestions I've seen might be a better option? Separate contexts for each entity, etc.
On 8/16/06, Douglas Garstang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, we're talking about several dozen, maybe 100, companies, per Asterisk box here.-----Original Message-----You might be able to use virtual NICs to eliminate the problem with "non-standard" ports for a company's SIP phones. Or real NICs using a couple of multi-homed cards.
From: David Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 11:36 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 'Hosting'
I haven't tried it, though.
On 8/16/06, Douglas Garstang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Has anyone ever tried to run multiple instances of Asterisk on a single system, running each with a different username, and each in a separate base directory? Something like /home/pbx/business-1, home/pbx/business-2 etc?
Did it work? I assume for every service that Asterisk runs, on each instance, you'd have to use a different port numbers, which may get confusing. Each businesses phones would have to be configred with different SIP ports then too.
What about processes? I notice that Asterisk runs about 26 processes (or are they threads?) for a single instance.Doug.
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
