----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Hewlett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com>
Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2006 3:34 PM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Bristuffed asterisk 1.2.10 on Suse 10 -
problemwith module versionmagic
On Saturday 16 September 2006 20:35, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 02:58:02PM +0200, Robert Rozman wrote:
> I'm banging my head on compiling bristuff modules for Suse 10.0 with
> kernel
>
>
> Linux laps1 2.6.13-15.11-smp #1 SMP Mon Jul 17 09:43:01 UTC 2006 x86_64
> x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
>
> and Asterisk 1.2.10-BRIstuffed-0.3.0-PRE-1s.
>
> I get this :
>
> laps1:~/Voipy/Bristuff/bristuff-0.3.0-PRE-1s/zaptel # modprobe zaphfc
> FATAL: Error inserting zaphfc
> (/lib/modules/2.6.13-15.11-smp/misc/zaphfc.ko): Invalid module format
>
> and this in dmesg :
>
> zaphfc: version magic '2.6.13-15.11-smp gcc-4.0' should be
> '2.6.13-15.11-smp SMP gcc-4.0'
This means you built zaptel with the wrong kernel headers. Is there a
SUSE power user in the crowd?
From memory as I do not use SUSE anymore..
Suse already has the zaptel modules in its kernel under the (IIRC) the
extra
directory (instead of misc) . you end up with 2 sets of zaptel modules in
the
linux module tree and modprobe then gets confused as to which to load.
Look for a directory /lib/modules/2.6.13-15.11-smp/extra
You must (again from memory) delete the old modules abd rerun depmod or
rebuild your asterisk
Thanks for the hint. I already did that. To me it seems that something is
messed up with settings, so zaphfc compiles with slightly different version
magic - note that the problem lies only in 'SMP' : '2.6.13-15.11-smp
gcc-4.0' vs '2.6.13-15.11-smp SMP gcc-4.0'
That's weird for me....
Any further help ?
Thanks in advance,
regards,
Rob.
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
