I don't see a problem here. Using includes you dedicate every company their own directory of configs. Macros are eithere system wide, or each comapny can create their own. I don't see why this is any harder than mutilple instances of asterisk.
On 9/25/06, Douglas Garstang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -----Original Message----- > From: Eric "ManxPower" Wieling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 11:24 AM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Running Multiple Instances of Asterisk > > > Asterisk does not support this, as it already has features for > multi-client configuration within a single Asterisk > installation/process. > > Douglas Garstang wrote: > > I'd like to know if anyone has sucessfully managed to run > multiple instances of Asterisk on the same system. > > > > - Did you run each instance as a separate user? > > - Did you have any install or config problems? > > - It looks like the G729 codec registration utility doesn't > work when files aren't installed in standard places. Did you > have this problem? > > - How many instances could be run on a single Asterisk box? What do you mean 'does not support'? How easy do you think the management of the configuration files is going to be if your trying to host several dozen companies on the one Asterisk instance? Sure, you can split things into contexts, but just try and imagine how complex the management is going to become when several companies comprise the same file space. Doug _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
