Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 09:30:04PM -0400, Kristian Kielhofner wrote:
Steve Totaro wrote:
I set caller ID to a unique identifier before sending to a transfer
partner or overflow call center. This makes it much easier to match
CDRs and get stats on the outcome of calls once they leave our center.
It is a very valuable and legitimate use. Am I committing a crime? nah.
This is exactly what I am talking about. That is a very useful
application of caller id manipulation. Why should you lose that useful
feature because a few misguided people sometimes use it for nefarious
purposes?
Strawman, Kristian; I already covered that, and confirmed that I
believe it to be an acceptable use, also, covered by agreement.
Cheers,
-- jra
jra,
If someone doesn't respect laws from Congress and State legislators,
they certainly aren't going to be stopped by a $0.02 civil agreement
drafted by some telcos legal team...
However, if such an agreement were required to "ensure" the reliability
and quality of caller id services, I would have no problem signing one. ;)
--
Kristian Kielhofner
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
