Benny Amorsen wrote:
"MG" == Michael Graves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MG> Who will benefit as long as calls must typically pass into
MG> existing PSTN infrstructure, and so be transcoded into G.711? It
MG> seems to me that only systems that are IP end-to-end stand to show
MG> the improvements...or am I mistunderstanding?
ISDN can transport G.722. Can Digium PRI cards do G.722?
Still, I think his point is the weakest link still the PSTN hop, no
matter where it will happen.
If you had only VOIP end-to-end, G.722 would be good, but in any step
going via PSTN (the PRI idea only solve one side of the PSTN
call..unless you have the PRI in both ends of the call with G.722 ?)
As people move forward into VOIP and peering, G.722 (and others) will
come into play I guess, meanwhile, only for interoffice VOIP calls I guess ?
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
