On 1/5/07, Lenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think we are going to do it if we get big problems with those many queues. From what I'm seeing, the biggest problems seem to be related to agents, so maybe we can have a try at using straight terminals instead of agents. l.
Being somewhat familiar with the innards of app_queue, I wouldn't personally want to set any client of mine up with 200 queues on one instance of app_queue. Like another list member mentioned earlier, I think the risk for deadlock is probably too great. You start adding queue weights into the mix and I shiver to think of what might happen. -- Bird's The Word Technologies, Inc. http://www.btwtech.com/ _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
