Robert Jenkins wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Tzafrir Cohen
Sent: 06 February 2007 10:34
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] New user question (X100P)
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 09:03:27AM -0000, Robert Jenkins wrote:
Hi,
I had similar problems with zaptel on a tdm2400.
I found that with the standard make & install, zaptel was being
started as a service but not properly initialising the card.
I disabled the service and added a few bits in rc.local; rmmod the
zaptel modules, sleep a couple of seconds, do a 'service
zaptel start'
to reload everything.
this is a bad hack. rl.local is done at the end of the
standard init.d scripts. Asterisk normally starts much before
that. All those sleep-s should not be necessary if the script
is properly written.
We all know that the standard init.d script is buggy. Please visit
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=8239
zaptel-helper is now in zaptel/xpp/utils of the SVN.
Please provide some feedback.
--
Tzafrir Cohen
Hi Tzafrir,
I know it's an ugly hack, but it works.
The only Digium hardware we have at present is in working systems so I can't
play...
A few seconds on the boot time is not that important, it should be a very
rare event on a production machine anyway.
When I build another system I'll have a look at zaptel-helper.
Thanks,
Robert Jenkins.
Hi,
I have seen this also, only on the TDM2400. I think it might be because it, i.e. this cards, takes
a bit longer than other cards to initialise, then when ztcfg is run, the card is not ready yet.
So I too (hangs head in shame), put something in rc.local to 'fix' it.
--
thanks,
Yusuf
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
