> > I've used both, I find chan_h323 more robust as it does less. Given it uses > > *'s rtp, means less chance of errors but also inherits problems of rtp.c > > (inability to set payload) My chan_oh323 still crashes on exit which > > concerns me on the quality. (I don't really care if it's on exit). Having > > So lets fix it! > I use asterisk-oh323 without problems for my setup. > If you provide the needed information I can fix it. > I believe it was due to adding different types of G.723 capabilities, I don't use H.323 anymore so it isn't an issue for me.
> > said that, the config options in chan_oh323 are great - the ability to turn > > on and off fast start and change the packet payload sizes is handy. My main > > problem with chan_h323 was G.729, which caused me switching to chan_oh323 > > I'm using chan_oh323 to pass through many G.729 calls to/from > Cisco 17xx boxes without a single problem. > Hence why I said I switched to chan_oh323 _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users