Joshua Colp schrieb: > Jack wrote: > >> Thanks for your answer and sorry for my late response. >> >> So what does this exactly mean to me? Can I keep chan_features.so from >> 1.4.4? What consequences does it have when chan_features.so is disabled >> und why has this been done? Is chan_features.so related to features.conf? >> >> > > chan_features.so doesn't provide anything useful, it's not used anywhere > because it's not really finished. As for why it was changed to be > disabled by default oej probably thought that since we aren't using it > why do we have it enabled by default. > > It's fine to live in a world without chan_features.so :) > > Thank you very much.
_______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users