My mistake...you're correct...should have tested it. Mojo with Horan & Company, LLC wrote: > But those are not REGEX expressions, those are asterisk dialplan > pattern-matching expressions. great for the X in: > > exten => _X.,1,blah > > but not for use with REGEX() function. > > I think it would be close to what Michael said, but like this: > 1{0,1}[2-9][0-9]{2}[2-9][0-9]{6} > > Michael, your expression would be satisfied by "1220000000" which has a > 0 in the first part of the prefix, no good, that one must be within 2-9 > range also. "1 220 *0*00 0000" > > > Moj > > Noah Miller wrote: >> Hi Again Brent - >> >>>> What would a valid regexp in Asterisk be to identify a NANP number, i.e., >>>> NXXNXXXXXX? >>> I think you've got it right already. What do you need to do? >> If you wanted to get more specific and identify ONLY NANP, you may >> have to break it out into more than just one rule: >> >> _800NXXXXXX >> _888NXXXXXX >> _877NXXXXXX >> _866NXXXXXX >> .... >> >> etc. >> >> BTW: I just read up and discovered that 855, 844, 833, and 822 are >> reserved but not yet used. >> >> >> - Noah >> >> _______________________________________________ >> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- >> >> asterisk-users mailing list >> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > >
_______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users