Walt Reed wrote: > On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 09:34:51AM -0600, Stephen Bosch said: >> Walt Reed wrote: >>> No, as I explained before with the reasons why, please don't post them >>> here. Send them DIRECTLY to the list admins. It is 100% off topic to >>> keep discussing a list administration / mail delivery problem here. >>> >>> List USERS can not help you. >>> >>> Considering that the vast majority of users do not experience such >>> delays, and that it's HIGHLY unlikely that Digium maintains a list of >>> who to delay mail for, the problem is 99% likely to be something >>> wrong with the recipient's system. It could be DNS, routing problems, >>> anti-spam mechanisms (greylisting, active sender verification, dspam, >>> SA, etc.) or timeouts caused by slow responses due to said anti-spam >>> mechanisms, etc. > > >> I don't buy this. This problem did not appear until Digium changed list >> servers. > > So you don't believe that the new servers may have shorter timeouts > than the old and that recipient configuration has no impact?
The delivery delay is demonstrably in Digium's network, so no, I don't. Recipient configurations have no impact on that. The new servers may indeed have shorter DNS timeouts, but again -- that's a list server administration issue. -Stephen- _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
