Yes, you are right. I know that I´m trying to use a queue with a strange functionality. Life is hard!!
I try to combine a short timeout and a short maxlimit. Thanks a lot!! On 7/12/07, Anthony Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Carlos Chavez wrote: > On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 15:03 -0300, equis software wrote: > >> I try setting joinempty=strict, but if there are all agent busy >> answering a call, i need that the queue reject new callers until one >> of the agents ends their calls. >> >> Example: >> Agent1 on call >> Agent2 on call >> >> When one call arrive, the queue reject the call. >> I don´t want to have callers waiting in the queue. >> Thanks! >> >> >> > Than why have a queue at all? The function of a queue is to have more > callers than agents. You can set the parameter maxlimit=2 on the queue > so if you only have two agents it will not allow any more caller to join > the queue. Again, this defeats the purpose of a queue. > > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- >> >> asterisk-users mailing list >> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users I believe maxlimit defines calls waiting. I could be wrong, I didn't take time to confirm that. I agree, thought you should just use dial(sip/dev1&sip/dev2,20,tr) or similiar and then if the "agents" are not available you can do whatever else with the call. _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
