On 8/4/07, Steve Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why are people so determined to break things. If you want to use > unicall-0.0.3pre11, use it with spandsp-0.0.2. Not really determined to break things, but to understand failures, even when those failures are because of version missmatching :)
> The latest versions of unicall (0.0.5) work with the latest spandsp > (0.0.4), but I have done nothing about making either of them work with > Asterisk. Minor changes were needed to chan_unicall. Anyone interested in using it can find it here: http://www.moythreads.com/astunicall/ > Its OK. I know why. :-) Its because people kept sending me bogus problem > reports saying "I should be getting signal 15 and I get 'E'". Well 'E' > was signal 15, but that seemed to confuse people. I have made matching > changes in more recent versions of spandsp and Unicall, to make signals > 11 to 15 give 'B' to 'F', instead of 'A' to 'E'. It doesn't affect the > behaviour of the software at all, as long as you use a matching set of > spandsp and unicall versions. Understood. Thanks. Moy _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users