Steve Totaro wrote: > > But in all reality, value added features such as support and automatic > updates aside, is there really a mainstream flavor of Linux that is > "better" or "worse" for running Asterisk (or other apps for that matter)? > > I have had equal luck with all that I have played with (but not heavy > load tested). > > I am bringing up several Fedora Core 7 boxen into production now. > > Besides a knee jerk reaction that "Fedora Sucks", can someone give a > real argument as to why I should or should not use it for production? > (besides the several MB of yum updates daily, which to me is a good thing). > > Besides naming a flavor and saying "It is the best", can someone add a > few statements as to why, which will obviously have to compare the other > flavors.
We've run all our servers on Gentoo with excellent results. Choose your Linux distribution for stability and ease of administration -- if it meets those requirements for you, it's a good choice. Linux is a beautiful thing. I've never had something more stable! -Stephen- _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users