Per Jessen wrote: > Atis Lezdins wrote: > > >> This seems nice way of sharing settings, however it wouldn't take over >> calls in progress. For us, currently the greatest problem is that >> whenever Asterisk crashes, calls are lost, and that means - lost >> money. Are there any ideas? >> > > Perhaps investigate/diagnose the craches? Software instability is not > solved with a high-availability solution. IMHO. > > > /Per Jessen, Zürich > > No. It's not. But there still exists the possibility even in a relatively stable situation that the software could crash or that hardware could fail. It's best, when planning a highly-available solution, to plan for the unforeseen and not assume you can avoid all mishaps. Let's assume, for the sake of argument, that the software will NEVER fail. Hardware still might, and that would still mean a lost call unless there's a way to switch running calls over to a new server seamlessly.
Are there such ways? IP calls are especially troublesome in that regard. N. _______________________________________________ Sign up now for AstriCon 2007! September 25-28th. http://www.astricon.net/ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users