I believe that using the Local/[EMAIL PROTECTED] format will give you a bit more flexibility in the dialplan design, as there is an added degree of indirection. In the end I think this is only marginally costier than the "raw" channel format (unless you use the /n option) and should provide for a better laid-out dialplan.
Just my $0.02, l. In data Tue, 02 Oct 2007 18:30:44 +0200, Thomas Kenyon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > Is there an advantage to having a Queue members URI in the form: > > SIP/User (or indeed IAX2/User) > Over > Local/<number>@context > > ? > > I know that the latter will allow you to do things like set counting > logic etc. through dialplan operations, but the former appears to be a > more direct route to calling the party. (and if need be, there is the > ability in queues to run a script on connection iirc). > > TIA for any clarification. > -- Home of QueueMetrics - http://queuemetrics.com _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users