rc1, rc2 is the best choice for me.
Best Regards. Emiliano Vazquez. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Russell Bryant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 2:54 PM Subject: [asterisk-users] Opinions on Release Numbering >I have been having discussions with various members of the development >community > in regards to changes to the way we manage open source Asterisk releases. > The > changes that we eventually decide on will determine how we manage the 1.6 > version of Asterisk. I will be posting much more detailed information > about 1.6 > in the near future. > > What I'm looking for right now is some opinions on version numbering. > Part of > the working plan for Asterisk 1.6 involves making release candidates for > every > 1.6.X release, so that various community members can help with doing > regression > testing on the changes before making the release. > > I proposed calling the release candidates 1.6.3-rc1, 1.6.3-rc2, etc. > > Another proposal has been using 1.5 to indicate that it is a release > candidate. > For example, 1.5.3, 1.5.3.1, 1.5.3.2, etc., would be the release > candidates for > the upcoming 1.6.3 release. > > What is your opinion? I certainly want the release naming to be as > obvious as > possible. > > -- > Russell Bryant > Senior Software Engineer > Open Source Team Lead > Digium, Inc. > > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users