Partially answering my own question, it looks like "slin" is a 128 kbps codec. Peter
________________________________ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Whisker, Peter Sent: 05 December 2007 16:02 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] Use of "slin" as a codec Where bandwidth is not an issue but good call quality is, is there any theoretical quality improvement to be had by using "slin" as the codec over an inter-Asterisk IAX trunk rather than a-law (or u-law in the US). Does anyone know what the slin bandwidth is (compared to 64 kbps a-law). Thanks Peter This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.
_______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
