Jesse, We have multiple installations of this scale and a few with far more concurrent call paths (250+). In our experience, Asterisk scales nicely to these levels as long as you are realistic about what you expect of the server. For instance, we rarely, if ever, convert signal to TDM. We instead use SIP dial tone from a tier-1 carrier. Also, if you expect any substantial amount of meetme conferences, you might want to consider running those on separate hardware. As the numbers go up, you can peel-apart your switch into functional duties such as two SIP switching servers, two voicemail servers, one conferencing server, etc.
Just some ideas. Best of luck to you! Bryan M. Johns Shelton | Johns Office: 678.248.2637 FindMe: 678.229.1809 Support: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sheltonjohns.com On Dec 27, 2007, at 11:33 AM, Jesse Molina wrote: > > Anyone have opinions on how well Asterisk scales to 500-1000 > stations, in > regards to reliability, system performance, as well as ease of > management? > > Assume relatively low call volume; let's say two public network PRIs > (47 > DS0s). > > > > -- > # Jesse Molina > # The Translational Genomics Research Institute > # http://www.tgen.org > # Mail = [EMAIL PROTECTED] > # Desk = 1.602.343.8459 > # Cell = 1.602.323.7608 > > > > > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users