"Steve Langstaff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Oops! Yes, I see that now - my fault for confusing Asterisk pattern > matching with RFC3435 pattern matching. Sorry.
Unfortunately inventing a new regex syntax seems to be a favourite pastime. Perhaps it would be possible to allow exten => /00.*/,Dial... It might cause problems with the ex-GF syntax. Another starting character could mean RFC3435 pattern matching. /Benny _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
