On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 8:05 AM, Gordon Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 18 Mar 2008, Steve Totaro wrote: > > > Why not try a different OS such as CentOS for now? That would be my next > step. > > I wouldn't suggest chasing distros is the way to solve issues, especially > if you're happy with the hardware. > > Personally, I'd go back to Debian, but stick to stable (Etch) and then > compile and install a custom kernel tailored exactly to your hardware, > then compile and install your own asterisk from source. > > But only because that's what I do, and it works for me ... > > Gordon
Well personally, I would go to 1.2.x unless there was some feature in 1.4 that is absolutely needed but the OP said that was not a long term option. I have deployed ONE 1.4 system and that is because I had to, no work arounds due to hardware (unless zaptel 1.4 plays nice with Asterisk 1.2). I will probably continue this train of thought (1.2.X is more production ready) until these threads stop popping up on the list. Thanks, Steve Totaro _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users