The thing is that's still the case. If they really wanted change they'd post the newest version of the firmware at www.polycom.com which they dont (well technically yes but you need to be a member of their reseller crap)
The byproduct of the corporate bureaucracy,. Isn't it great? On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 8:54 AM, Eric Wieling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > An amazing change from the old days when you could only get firmware > from a Polycom authorized distributer. > > > Jonathan C. Bailey wrote: > > Polycom is affiliated with the project in some way.. They also have an > official Polycom moderated vendor forum. > > > > -Jon > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Andreas van dem Helge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" > <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 3:21:30 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central > > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] OT: Polycom 3.0 > > > > How do they get away with that? > > > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 7:23 PM, Jonathan C. Bailey > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Try the RPM from Trixbox. If you need something to open the file on > Windows, 7zip works fine.. > >> > >> > http://yum.trixbox.org/centos/5/RPMS/repodata/repoview/firmware-polycom-0-3.0.1-2.html > > > > _______________________________________________ > -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
