On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 09:21:37PM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 02:00:57PM -0400, Andreas van dem Helge wrote: > > Is Zaptel 1.4.10 compatible with RHEL 3 (2.4.21-53.ELsmp)? Because I > > can compile 1.2.20.1 just fine but 1.4 says: > > > > echo "You do not appear to have the sources for the 2.4.21-53.ELsmp > > kernel installed." > > You do not appear to have the sources for the 2.4.21-53.ELsmp kernel > > installed. > > exit 1 > > make[1]: *** [modules] Error 1 > > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/zaptel-1.4.10' > > make: *** [all] Error 2 > > > > > > Yes kernel-source is installed, there is no kernel-devel. I read one > > account where if I use non-SMP kernel it might work. But there's no > > fun it that. 1.2 works why not 1.4? Failing getting 1.4 to work can I > > use Zaptel 1.2 with Asterisk 1.4? I think not but just wanted to make > > sure. > > Zaptel will look as the kernel source for (in this specific order) > > 1. Whatever you explicitly set in KSRC (if you did) > 2. /lib/modules/$KVERS/build (if you set KVERS explicitly) > 3. /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build > 4. /usr/src/linux-2.4 > 5. /usr/src/linux > > 'build' in (2) and (3) is normally a symlink to the path of the kernel.
I forgot to mention that there's an additional test done: the source directory found (KSRC) has to have a file called ".config" in it . Which is the first of those directories that you actually have? To better debug this, edit the Makefile. Find the line with that error message and add the word '$(KSRC)' (without quotes) to it. This should help you see what the makefile thought is the kernel source tree. -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users