I'm not an expert, but FastAGI you use in a live channel over TCP connection
... Most people agree it is better because doesn't spawn a new process every
time it is called ... but they also suggest to do not use in the same server ...
DeadAGI you cannot use it in a live channel ...
By the way, a2billing is a nice software ... Areski does a great job ... I
neither use it a lot nor in a production high volume environment but I liked it
...
----- Original Message -----
Subject: [asterisk-users] Performance issues
From: "chetherston miles" >;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, May 6, 2008 10:20
Hello,
We are thinking in use asterisk-java to an billing solution, wich is the better
choice, and if someone could give us a understandable description about the
difference between DeadAGI and FastAGI, i found a very interesting project
called asterisk2billing and they use DeadAGI, anyway wich one scale better?
And there is a tool for test performance?
Thanks,
Roberto
_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
